Raymonda

A grand ballet of courtly romance and orientalist spectacle

← Back to Stories
Raymonda Ballet

Origins and Historical Context

Raymonda stands as one of the last great classical ballets of the Imperial Russian era, premiering at the Mariinsky Theatre in St. Petersburg on January 19, 1898. Created during the golden age of Russian ballet, it emerged from the collaboration of three masters: choreographer Marius Petipa, composer Alexander Glazunov, and librettist Lydia Pashkova. This triumvirate produced a work that would become both celebrated for its magnificent choreography and criticized for its problematic narrative, reflecting the complex cultural attitudes of late 19th-century Imperial Russia.

The ballet was commissioned during a period when the Russian Imperial Ballet was at its zenith, with Petipa serving as chief choreographer and creating some of his most enduring masterpieces. Glazunov, then in his early thirties, was already established as one of Russia's leading composers, known for his lush orchestrations and melodic gift. The original production starred Pierina Legnani as Raymonda and Pavel Gerdt as Jean de Brienne, with sets and costumes designed by Konstantin Ivanov and Heinrich Levogt that emphasized both medieval grandeur and orientalist fantasy.

The ballet's creation coincided with the height of European orientalism, a cultural movement that romanticized and often misrepresented Eastern cultures. This context is crucial to understanding both the ballet's original appeal and its later controversies. The work reflects the 19th-century European fascination with the "exotic East," presenting a narrative that pits Christian virtue against Saracen sensuality, embodying the cultural prejudices and imperial attitudes of its time.

The Ballet's Story

Act I

The ballet opens in the courtyard of Countess Sybil's castle in medieval Provence during the time of the Crusades. Raymonda, the Countess's beautiful niece, awaits the return of her beloved Jean de Brienne from the Holy Land. The act begins with a celebration in honor of Raymonda, featuring the famous "Pizzicato" variation and the elegant "Valse Fantastique." The medieval court comes alive with noble ladies, pages, and troubadours in a series of classical variations that showcase Petipa's mastery of academic ballet technique.

During the festivities, Raymonda is presented with a tapestry depicting her ancestor, the White Lady, who appears to her in a vision. This supernatural element introduces the ballet's mystical undertones, as the White Lady seems to warn Raymonda of impending danger. The act concludes with Raymonda's famous "Grand Adagio" and subsequent variation, where she dances with a scarf, creating flowing, ethereal movements that became iconic of the role. The choreography here emphasizes the ballerina's line, port de bras, and lyrical quality, establishing Raymonda as one of the great showcase roles for classical technique.

Act II

The second act shifts dramatically in tone and setting, taking place in a fantastic orientalist dream sequence. Abderakhman, a Saracen knight, has arrived at the castle and becomes enchanted by Raymonda's beauty. This act is structured around Raymonda's dream, induced by Abderakhman's magic, where Eastern and Western elements blend in a spectacular fantasia. The choreography incorporates orientalist movement vocabulary - undulating arms, exotic port de bras, and sinuous backbends - that were typical of how European ballet represented Eastern dance traditions.

The act features some of Glazunov's most seductive music, including the famous "Danse Arabe" and various character dances that showcase different "Eastern" styles as imagined by 19th-century Europeans. Raymonda finds herself torn between her loyalty to Jean de Brienne and her attraction to the mysterious Abderakhman. The choreography for this act includes elaborate ensemble pieces, with the corps de ballet representing various exotic elements of Raymonda's dream world, from odalisques to warriors.

The dramatic climax occurs when Abderakhman attempts to seduce Raymonda, but she resists his advances. The act typically ends with the appearance of the White Lady, who breaks the spell and awakens Raymonda from her dangerous dream. This supernatural intervention serves as both a dramatic device and a moral statement about virtue triumphing over temptation.

Act III

The final act returns to reality as Jean de Brienne arrives at the castle with his Crusader knights, only to find Abderakhman and his Saracen warriors already there. The confrontation between the two suitors leads to single combat between Jean de Brienne and Abderakhman, with Raymonda's hand as the prize. This act showcases Petipa's skill in choreographing male variations, with both rivals performing virtuosic solos that contrast their different characters - Jean's noble, upright style versus Abderakhman's more exotic, grounded approach.

Jean de Brienne emerges victorious, killing Abderakhman in combat, which resolves the central conflict but also highlights the ballet's troubling racial and religious undertones. The final portion of the act transforms into a grand celebration of the engagement between Raymonda and Jean de Brienne, featuring the famous "Grand Pas Classique Hongrois" - a Hungarian-inspired suite that includes some of the ballet's most challenging and beloved variations.

The wedding celebration incorporates various national dances, including Spanish, Hungarian, and other European character dances, creating a cosmopolitan festivation that celebrates Western European culture. The ballet concludes with a magnificent finale featuring the entire company, with Raymonda and Jean de Brienne performing a triumphant pas de deux that showcases the full range of classical ballet technique.

Notable Dance Sequences and Variations

Raymonda is renowned for containing some of the most technically demanding and musically sophisticated variations in the classical repertoire:

The choreography demands exceptional technical skill, particularly from the title role, requiring mastery of multiple classical styles from pure academic technique to character dance. The role of Raymonda has become a benchmark for ballerinas, testing their ability to convey both innocence and sophistication, technical precision and dramatic depth. The male roles, particularly Jean de Brienne, showcase the noble cavalier tradition of classical ballet, while Abderakhman requires an artist capable of portraying exotic allure without resorting to stereotypical caricature.

Musical Brilliance

Glazunov's score for Raymonda represents one of the finest achievements in ballet music, demonstrating his gift for melody, orchestration, and dramatic structure. The composer created distinct musical languages for the ballet's different worlds: the refined, classical melodies of the medieval court contrast sharply with the exotic orientalist themes associated with Abderakhman and his followers. The score's sophisticated use of leitmotifs helps to unify the work while highlighting character development and dramatic progression.

The music's technical demands match those of the choreography, requiring orchestral virtuosity and sensitivity to dance rhythms. Glazunov's understanding of ballet music is evident in his careful attention to phrase structure, dynamic contrast, and the specific needs of different types of dance movement. The Hungarian suite in Act III demonstrates his ability to incorporate folk elements into a classical framework, creating music that is both authentically flavored and balletically functional.

Many of Raymonda's musical numbers have achieved independent concert life, particularly the suites arranged by the composer himself. The "Pizzicato" from Act I and various Hungarian dances remain popular orchestral pieces, testimony to Glazunov's melodic invention and orchestral craft. The score's influence can be traced in later ballet compositions, particularly in how it balances symphonic development with dance requirements.

Cultural and Social Relevance

Raymonda's cultural significance extends far beyond its musical and choreographic merits, serving as a complex artifact of late 19th-century European attitudes toward race, religion, and cultural identity. The ballet's orientalist framework reflects the imperial mindset of its era, presenting Eastern cultures through a distinctly European lens that emphasized exotic difference while asserting Western moral and cultural superiority. This perspective, while typical of its time, has made the ballet problematic for contemporary audiences and companies.

The work's treatment of religious conflict, casting Christian crusaders as heroic and Saracen characters as dangerous seducers, reflects the religious prejudices of Imperial Russia and broader European society. Abderakhman's characterization as a figure of exotic temptation who must be destroyed to preserve Christian virtue embodies orientalist stereotypes that were common in 19th-century European art and literature but are now recognized as harmful and reductive.

Modern productions of Raymonda face the challenge of preserving the ballet's undeniable artistic merits while addressing its problematic content. Some companies have attempted to reimagine the story in different historical contexts, while others have focused on the ballet's purely abstract dance elements, minimizing the narrative aspects. These adaptations reflect ongoing debates within the ballet world about how to handle classical works that contain outdated or offensive cultural assumptions.

Choreographic Legacy and Evolution

Petipa's choreography for Raymonda represents the culmination of his long career and demonstrates his mastery of large-scale ballet construction. The work showcases his ability to create choreography that serves both dramatic and purely aesthetic purposes, with dance sequences that advance the narrative while providing opportunities for technical display. His integration of character dance elements with classical academic technique became a model for later choreographers working with culturally diverse material.

The ballet's structure influenced subsequent classical works, particularly in its use of dream sequences and supernatural elements to expand choreographic possibilities. Petipa's handling of the large ensemble scenes, particularly in Acts II and III, demonstrated new ways of organizing corps de ballet work that created both spectacular visual effects and dramatic impact. His choreographic treatment of cultural difference, while problematic in its assumptions, showed sophisticated understanding of how movement vocabulary could convey character and cultural identity.

Later choreographers have found inspiration in Raymonda's formal structure while addressing its cultural problems. Rudolf Nureyev's productions attempted to humanize Abderakhman's character, while other versions have relocated the story to different historical periods or emphasized its dream-like qualities to minimize literal interpretation. These adaptations demonstrate the ongoing vitality of the ballet's choreographic framework, even as its original narrative context becomes increasingly problematic.

Performance Tradition and Notable Interpreters

Raymonda has served as a vehicle for many of the greatest ballerinas in history, each bringing different qualities to the challenging title role. From Pierina Legnani's original interpretation through Galina Ulanova's poetic approach to Sylvie Guillem's technical brilliance, the role has been shaped by changing performance traditions and evolving ballet technique. The ballet's demands require artists capable of classical purity, dramatic conviction, and cultural sensitivity.

Russian and Soviet ballet companies maintained Raymonda as a cornerstone of their repertoire throughout the 20th century, with the Mariinsky and Bolshoi theaters developing distinct performance traditions. The role became particularly associated with Soviet ballerinas who excelled in both classical technique and dramatic interpretation, including Maya Plisetskaya and Natalia Makarova. These artists found ways to humanize Raymonda's character while showcasing the role's technical requirements.

Western companies have approached Raymonda more selectively, often presenting excerpts rather than the complete ballet due to concerns about its cultural content. However, the "Raymonda Variations" and other concert versions have remained popular, allowing audiences to experience Glazunov's music and Petipa's choreography without engaging with the problematic narrative. This selective approach reflects broader questions about how classical ballet should handle works that contain outdated cultural assumptions.

Contemporary Relevance and Future Directions

Today's ballet world continues to grapple with Raymonda's complex legacy, seeking ways to preserve its artistic achievements while acknowledging its cultural problems. The ballet serves as a case study in how classical works can be recontextualized for contemporary audiences without losing their essential character. Some companies have found success in presenting the work as a historical artifact, explicitly acknowledging its orientalist assumptions while celebrating its artistic merits.

The ongoing discussion around Raymonda reflects broader conversations within the arts about cultural representation, historical context, and artistic responsibility. These debates have led to more nuanced approaches to programming classical works, with companies providing contextual information and sometimes commissioning new works that offer alternative perspectives on similar themes. The ballet's treatment of cultural difference continues to provide opportunities for educational programming and audience engagement.

Despite its problematic elements, Raymonda remains important for understanding the development of classical ballet and the cultural forces that shaped the art form. Its magnificent choreography and music continue to inspire artists and audiences, while its cultural content provides opportunities for reflection on how art both reflects and shapes social attitudes. The ballet's future likely lies in approaches that honor its artistic achievements while honestly confronting its cultural limitations, ensuring that this complex masterpiece continues to contribute to ballet's ongoing evolution.